EDU 655 Week 5 Assignment Personalized Learning NEW
Price: $25.00 $8.99
Qty: Check out
This Tutorial Purchased: 10 Times. Tutorial Rating:
This Tutorial contains following Attachments:No Attachments
EDU 655 Week 5 Assignment Personalized Learning
This assignment assesses your ability to draw conclusions about the differences between monolithic and personalized learning models, determine the consequences and implications of personalized learning and to develop recommendations for designing a personalized learning environment. This assignment also assesses your ability to evaluate instructional design projects, analyze the principles of instruction, apply theories of motivation and performance to instructional design, and analyzeemerging instructional design technologies. Before completing this assignment, review the “Grading Rubric” and the Week Five “Instructor Guidance” page.
Instructions: Submit a document that is three-to-four pages, not including the title and references pages, addressing each item in the list below with support from the Reiser and Dempsey (2012) textbook, the American Institutes for Research (2013), Ashmana, et al (2014), and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (2014) articles, and at least one other scholarly source. If you have questions about the expectations for drawing conclusions and determining consequences and implications, constructing and presenting recommendations, written communication, and APA formatting in the “Grading Rubric,” please post your questions in the “Ask Your Instructor” Discussion before the due date.
1. Draw conclusions about the differences between monolithic and personalized learning models. Ensure your conclusions consider assumptions, data, evidence, and contexts related to personalized learning.
2. Determine the consequences and implications of personalized learning. Ensure your determinations consider assumptions, data, evidence, and contexts related to personalized learning.
3. Develop at least three recommendations for designing personalized learning environments. Ensure your recommendations are constructed in a convincing, logically supported fashion and justified with evidence from credible (i.e., scholarly) sources.
You are also encouraged to share your assignment with peers using the “Doc Sharing” tool and to review what peers share there as well. Though using the “Doc Sharing” tool is not associated with your grade, it is encouraged as a way to review a variety of conclusions and recommendations and promote the giving and receiving of feedback with classmates. For assistance using the “Doc Sharing” tool, browse the “Help” files for the course and request additional assistance if needed using the “Ask Your Instructor” discussion.
Write a reviewYour Name:
Your Review: Note: HTML is not translated!
A B C D F
Enter the code in the box below:
Assignment Cloud © 2020 All Rights Reserved